Search for: "United States v. Winston" Results 181 - 198 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2008, 6:51 pm
Topliff The Supreme Court of the United States, 1892   "The empires of the future are the empires of the mind. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
(Ars Technica) EPO President Alison Brimelow asks Enlarged Board of Appeal to address questions about patentability of software in Europe (Hal Wegner) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Ars Technica) (IPKat) (IAM) (Managing Intellectual Property) Belgium: ISP Scarlet successfully overturns court order requiring it to use filter to stop file sharing (Techdirt) (Ars Technica) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Out-Law) (The Trademark Blog) (Out-Law)   Global Ex-Kazaaer wants to turn pirates… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 4:15 am
Early in 1941, Ribbentrop and I promised the Japanese foreign minister, Yosuke Matsuoka, that should Japan become engaged in a war against the United States, Germany would join the war immediately. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
As people in the United States moved from the countryside into cities, their milk supply became increasingly unhealthy. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The following is a list of facilities for individuals with cerebral palsy in Mississippi compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:29 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Court Explains Sentence Imposed After Guilty Plea On Indictment Charging Illegal Re-Entry United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
But the impact of past decisions may pale in comparison to the Court's resolution, to be made next year, of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
United States, when it held: "When a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.'" In United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Dissenting Member Walsh stated: Sound policy considerations underlie the statute's requirement that the showing of interest supporting a deauthorization election must be collected after the employees are subject to a union-security clause. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:19 pm
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Defendant Failed to Meet Four-Part Test for Release Pending Appeal Pursuant to 18 USC §3143(b) United States v. [read post]