Search for: "Valdez v. US"
Results 181 - 200
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Take, for example, O'Brien v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:02 pm
In the court's previous punitive damages case, Philip Morris v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 3:27 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Wednesday heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:25 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 4:39 am
Hart v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:01 pm
Motorola Credit Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:15 pm
Blawgletter reported yesterday about the Supreme Court's accepting review of the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Salinas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:48 am
See also Valdez v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:55 am
Valdez, 2007 U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:43 am
Link (to PDF of opinion): Christoff v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:56 am
A ruling Wednesday by a judge granting the defense judgment NOV in Nelson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:09 pm
Yet another case arising out of the Exxon Valdez tragedy. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 4:54 am
The Eighth Amendment excludes de minimus uses of physical force. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 4:47 am
Valdez, 2007 U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:03 am
" Valdez v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:11 pm
Valdez, 2007 Wash. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
(quoting Valdez, 172 F.3d at 1225). [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The Petitioner (PACE Local 8-0369) sought to represent a unit of all operations and maintenance technicians at the Employer's Valdez Marine Terminal (VMT) facility, relying on the Board's longstanding presumption that a single-facility unit is appropriate for collective bargaining. [read post]
