Search for: "Vines v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On Thursday 20 July 2023 there was a statement in open court in the case of Vine v Belfield. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
One of the more significant recent developments in the corporate and securities litigation arena has been the emergence of the debate over fee-shifting bylaws following the Delaware Supreme Court’s May 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A Los Angeles businessman has been rewarded one of the largest Internet defamation awards ever. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Warby J noted in Barron MP & Anor v Vines (Rev 1) [2015] EWHC 1161 (QB) (see our blog here) that the section 4 defence is also potentially available to protect expressions of opinion (such as on political matters) even where the section 3 defence of honest opinion is not available, although it is hard to envisage circumstances where that would happen. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 23 February 2016 the assessment of damages in the UKIP libel case of Barron v Vines, was adjourned because the judge, Sir Michael Tugendhat, recused himself. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm by Robert Laplaca
In October, Amazon announced that it was prohibiting incentivized reviews except through its Amazon Vine program. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
99% Infringing… http://t.co/24vLFPEtJu -> Washington State Passes Social Networking Privacy Legislation http://t.co/oLRiRIuaFc -> Making social networks remediate defamation enabled by their platforms: McKeogh v Facebook: A recent Irish cas… http://t.co/YYPAjpImvI -> Google's Eric Schmidt Says Hollywood's 'Storytelling Wins' in 'The New Digital Age' http://t.co/6puWKdM9R2 -> Keen On … Antitrust: Why Startup Entrepreneurs Should Fear Google… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm by Jeffrey Lubbers
Justice Robert Jackson famously described the Act four years later in the case of Wang Yang Sung v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:00 am by FDABlog HPM
  FDA never substantively responded to the petition . . . allowing it to effectively die on the vine and become moot once the U.S. [read post]