Search for: "WAGNER v STATE"
Results 181 - 200
of 780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
To understand how we got to Janus v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:02 pm
Janis later e-mailed Wagner, stating that the committee was enthusiastic about her candidacy. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:37 pm
In Wagner Oil Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:25 am
For example, in Ratliff v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:10 am
Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine & Underberg, 88 AD2d 547, 548 [1st Dept 1982]; see Matter of Jacob D. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
Wagner the other two. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 5:42 pm
Wagner, Gregory M. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am
Wagner and Walters came to complain about the newly added scienter requirements. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:11 am
Wood is a Wisconsin criminal & DUI defense lawyer & shareholder at Van Wagner & Wood, S.C. in Madison, Wisconsin. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:40 am
Wood is a Wisconsin criminal & DUI defense lawyer & shareholder at Van Wagner & Wood, S.C. in Madison, Wisconsin. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
In the courts: Negassi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 386 (Admin) (04 March 2011): Asylum seeker not entitled to damages for being prevented from working even though UK failed to properly implement EU Directive (see our post on last year’s supreme court decision on asylum seekers’ right to work). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
Walker, 234 N.W. 144, 147 (Mich. 1931); Wagner Electric Corp. v. [read post]
