Search for: "WEST v. MATTHEWS" Results 181 - 200 of 385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
 In anticipation of the release the government announced that there will be ‘no legal changes,’ Matthew Hancock, the cabinet office minister who commissioned the report, said “after 10 years we took the decision to review the Freedom of Information Act and we have found it is working well. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:04 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: At NYU Law Review Online, Matthew Christiansen previews next week’s oral argument in Hughes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
For a more complete transcript, see the appendix to Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
Regardless of how the shift occurred, she suggested that ”there is no longer any doubt that the group and its adherents have both the desire and the capability to carry out relatively sophisticated mass-casualty attacks in the West, or at least in Europe. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm by Elina Saxena
” The Washington Post reports that a day after the meeting, the Kremlin “played down the possibility of a grand coalition with the West to strike the Islamic State in Syria. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
With Russian air support, the government has begun to wage a fierce battle for territory in the country’s west. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
“The involvement of Russia and Iran is essential,” he writes: Assad “will not end the war by accepting concessions imposed by the West, but is likely to do so if urged by his allies. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:15 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Chicago lawyer Richard Beem on his blog, Beem on Patents Remijas v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Andy
This follows a number of landmark cases including Wheaton v Peters 33 US (8 Pet) 591, 668 (1834), Banks & Bros v West Publishing Co 27 F 50 (CCD) Minn, 1886, right up to the case of the State of Georgia v The Harrison Company 548 F Supp 110 (N d Ga 1982). [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
” Ingrid Wuerth linked us to her new commentary on Zivotofsky v. [read post]