Search for: "Wade v. District of Columbia"
Results 181 - 190
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2008, 6:55 am
"Safety in Defenselessness: The District of Columbia tries to save its gun law by misreading it. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 3:50 pm
The gun case (District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 4:02 am
We all pretty much agreed that a victory for the District of Columbia could be costly to the Democratic Presidential nominee, because it would activate the strongly Republican leaning gun rights groups. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
District of Columbia, have on the upcoming 2008 elections? [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
Wade, Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Maryland: UCP of Central Maryland 1700 Reiserstown Road, Suite 226 Baltimore, MD 21208-2935 Phone: (410) 484-4540; (800) 451-2452 (Toll Free/TDD) Fax: (410) 486-3825 E-mail: info@ucp-cm.org Web: http://www.ucp-cm.org Arbutus Development Center 1201 Maple Avenue Baltimore, MD 21227 Phone: (410) 247-4912 Coldspring Development Center 1111 East Coldspring Lane Baltimore, MD 21239 Phone: (410) 323-7261 Cumberland Center 12512 Nave's Crossroad, NE… [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599
A7936
Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598
A7905
Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597
A7892
Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in mutual… [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 5:02 am
Whether the Supreme Court will be willing to wade into this new debate any time soon may well depend upon its reaction to the coming petition for review in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:02 am
District of Columbia for citing Dred Scott v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:22 pm
"Given the lengthy debates and disagreements among Members of Congress as to the handling of these detainees, and the perception that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit failed to follow this Court's direction in Rasul v. [read post]
