Search for: "Wal-Mart Associates, IncĀ " Results 181 - 200 of 624
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
., Discrimination Rules Create Risks For Employer Reliance On Injunction Of FMLA Rule On Same-Sex Partners’ Marital Status; EEOC Suit Against Pipe Fitting Business Shows Disability Discrimination Risks For Employers Hiring Vets With PTSD; EEOC Charges Employer Violated ADA By Terminating Employment At FMLA Leave End; Texas Employers Top Target For EEOC Charges; Wal-Mart Settlement Shows ADA Risks When Considering Employee Return To Work Accommodation Requests… [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 1:13 pm by Bill Marler
The firm has brought Salmonella lawsuits against companies such as Cargill, ConAgra, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Taco Bell, Subway and Wal-Mart. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 8:49 am by Bill Marler
Salmonella has been the most frequently studied bacteria associated with reactive arthritis. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm by Charles Casper
One wonders how this invitation to certify now and decertify later when more evidence is in satisfies the Supreme Court’s view that Rule 23(b)(3) “requires the judge to make findings about predominance and superiority before allow allowing the class,” Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 In August 2013, NWTM filed another ITU application for “BULLET BULLION,” for use in association with “[p]recious metals, namely gold and silver bullion. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:17 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., which required the Second District Court of Appeal to determine whether a plaintiff’s military records were discoverable in his personal injury case. [read post]
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [1] The Court had issued an earlier order, without an opinion, that Wal-Mart could exclude Trinity’s Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposal relating to the sale of firearms with high-capacity magazines from Wal-Mart’s proxy materials because it related to “ordinary business operations. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:45 pm
Intelligize serves Fortune 500 companies, such as Starbucks, IBM, Microsoft, Verizon and Wal-Mart, as well as some of the top global accounting and law firms. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 4:16 pm by Bill Marler
The law firm has brought Salmonella lawsuits against such companies as Cargill, ConAgra, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Taco Bell, Subway and Wal-Mart. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:37 pm by Associated Press
Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, told The Associated Press on Wednesday that the shipping subscription service will cost customers $50 a year. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Note that if the PTO had registered a product design without evidence of secondary meaning, it would plainly have erred after Wal-Mart. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:36 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the First District Court of Appeal held that a pharmacist could be found negligent for continuing to prescribe a potent painkiller even though the prescription didn’t have a time limit because continuing to prescribe the medication created an obvious risk of a customer’s death absent a particular drug regime. 878 So. 2d 426, 427-28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, a supervisor’s alleged statement that that “[s]he could do more when she was younger than she can now” was a stray remark and not tied to his firing (Dominick v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., March 16, 2015, Teilborg, J.). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 am by Wes Anderson
But Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has styled the website as something else – infringement upon its WALMART trademark. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:12 am by Dan Frydl
The “Top Businesses in America” program is sponsored by major brands, including Apple, AT&T, Wal-Mart, Coca-Cola, Office Depot, Toyota, Cisco, and Verizon. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 That decision, issued by Judge Leonard Sand, held that because the named plaintiffs were not current employees, the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]