Search for: "Walk v. Ohio Supreme Court" Results 181 - 200 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
  In one case widely seen as destined for the Supreme Court - United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  Oddly, since the US Supreme Court held last year in Padilla v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  The last portion of the Supreme Court’s opinion on this in State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm by Orin Kerr
Judge Phipps continued: I find persuasive the opinion of the Ohio Supreme Court in Ohio v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
In 2008, the Supreme Court remanded Moore 1 for reconsideration in light of its decision in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Supreme Court was denied in June 2012, along with a Presbyterian case from Georgia (132 Sup.Ct. 2773)32. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
The Ohio Supreme Court took a look at this back in 2004 in State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:07 am by SHG
Ohio, for example, the Supreme Court laid down the rule that evidence obtained by the police through a n unreasonable search and seizure may not be used in a state criminal prosecution. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  The Supreme Court has held that a dog sniff in a public area is not a search. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm by SCOTUStalk
Deanne Maynard, co-chair of Morrison & Foerster’s Appellate and Supreme Court practice, has argued 14 cases before the Supreme Court since her first oral argument in 2004. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:31 am
The only major  opinion out of the Supreme Court last week was the unanimous reversal of the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:30 am by Russ Bensing
” But this case, the court decides, is not even a close call on that score:  Johnson didn’t change course or otherwise react suspiciously to the police, but simply kept walking in the same direction at the same pace, conduct which “was the quintessential example of ‘going about one’s business’ — protected, unsuspicious conduct that the Supreme Court has characterized as ‘the opposite’ of flight. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:00 am
, from the Connecticut Employment Law Blog, citing yours truly and remarking that the Supreme Court's decision in Federal Express v. [read post]