Search for: "Walls v. United States of America" Results 181 - 200 of 719
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2019, 3:45 pm by CAFE
Code § 953: Private correspondence with foreign governments, Legal Information Institute “Giuliani Is Said to Be Under Investigation for Ukraine Work,” New York Times, 10/11/19 “Federal Prosecutors Scrutinize Rudy Giuliani’s Ukraine Business Dealings, Finances,” Wall Street Journal, 10/14/19 "Trump tells reporters he doesn’t know if Giuliani is still his attorney,” Washington Post, 10/11/19 INDICTMENT OF… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am by Florian Mueller
"At its core, "STRONGER" is ananti-America Invents Act,anti-Supreme Court,anti-Federal Circuit,anti-PTAB,anti-eBay v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie chronicles the recent maneuvering and “histrionics” over whether “New York City’s altered legal terrain will be enough to erase” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Paul C. Light
First, the media put a human face on the shutdown and showed the nation what federal employees do to keep America going. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at a new First Amendment challenge to Michigan’s plan to establish an independent redistricting commission; Mazie notes that the Supreme Court cited the Michigan effort approvingly in Rucho v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel and Sherry F. Colb
From outer space, when people see the United States, they would see Trump Wall. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that “[w]ithin days, America’s highest court will weigh in on one of President Donald Trump’s most divisive policies: his plan to build a wall on the southern border. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:42 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer http://www.rrbdlaw.com/4696/securities-industry-commentator/United States of America, Appellee, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court should have revived a doctrine that prohibits Congress from delegating its authority to other entities, observing that “[i]t’s not often one has the opportunity to undo an original sin. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Obviously neither state is a gerrymandered district, but most experts thought that both states were safely beyond the reach of Republican presidential candidates – part of the so-called “blue wall. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
But I also believe, and it's personal -- and I was actually very -- it was hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States “may have opened up a big can of worms. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that Monday’s decision in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, the court held 6-3 that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act. [read post]