Search for: "Ward v. U.s.*"
Results 181 - 200
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
BREED v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:14 pm
” Purdy v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:47 am
Banca Cremi, S.A. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
Although the taxing power may not be used to impose “punishment for an unlawful act,” United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Dize v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/08/08-99035.pdf Bills v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:01 pm
Ward,486 F.3d 1212 (11th Cir. 2007); Belt v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 10:09 am
Nance v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:17 pm
(iii) Consent for wards of the State (I) In general If the child is a ward of the State and is not residing with the child’s parent, the agency shall make reasonable efforts to obtain the informed consent from the parent (as defined in section 1401 of this title) of the child for an initial evaluation to determine whether the child is a child with a disability. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:17 pm
(iii) Consent for wards of the State (I) In general If the child is a ward of the State and is not residing with the child’s parent, the agency shall make reasonable efforts to obtain the informed consent from the parent (as defined in section 1401 of this title) of the child for an initial evaluation to determine whether the child is a child with a disability. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:54 am
Praxair Distribution, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 30, 2008 US v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court explained this rationale in the nineteenth century case, Rude v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Ward, No. 06-5136, 06-5410, 06-5680"Defendants' sentences for various drug trafficking crimes are affirmed over claims that: 1) a prior felony drug conviction was improperly used as a predicate offense for purposes of career offender status; 2) a firearm enhancement was improper; 3) one defendant's sentence enhancement for being an organizer, leader, manager or supervisor was not warranted; 4) U.S.S.G. section 3B.1.1 is unconstitutionally vague; and 5) a sentence was… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:37 pm
Martin v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court in Gall v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
