Search for: "Warner "
Results 181 - 200
of 7,931
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”When he later received an employment offer from Time Warner, Verizon warned JL that it considered that company a “competitor,” and that a move would subject him to litigation. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- Proper construction of claim limitations reciting the chemical property of pH (which denotes the concentration of hydrogen ions in a solution as an indication of acidity) has arisen several times in district court and Federal Circuit opinions, perhaps the most notable being in Warner-Jenkinson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
” Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:01 am
Kronk Warner PDF Second-Generation Source of Income Housing DiscriminationArmen H. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:23 pm
If you are convicted, you will have a criminal record, and you can […] The post How to Beat a PL 120.00 Assault Charge appeared first on Cody Warner, P.C.. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Antagonisms Flare as Red States Try to Dictate How Blue Cities Are Run MSN – Molly Hennessy-Fiske (Washington Post) | Published: 11/27/2023 Despite long advocating small government and local control, Republican governors and legislators across a significant swath of the country are increasingly overriding the actions of Democratic cities – removing elected district attorneys or threatening to strip them of power, taking over election offices, and otherwise… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 11:31 am
Downloader, made by app developer Elias Saba, was suspended on Sunday after a DMCA notice submitted by copyright-enforcement firm MarkScan on behalf of Warner Bros. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:10 pm
Based on a vague DMCA notice, it appears that Downloader was suspended simply because it can load the Warner Bros. website. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am
Recently, the judge in Sandoz v BMS ([2023] EWCA Civ 472) interpreted G2/21 as being close to an ab initio plausibility standard in line with the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:59 pm
Advertising industry insiders told the Financial Times and Forbes that Yaccarino got bombarded all weekend by industry friends advising her to resign, or else face a "credibility crisis" as major brands—including Apple, Disney, IBM, Lionsgate, Paramount Global, Sony, and Warner Bros. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:12 pm
Berk, and friends and partners Brett and David Warner, I am a co-founder of and will serve as general counsel of PURE Pickleball – an ambitious project bringing one of the largest pickleball facilities in the world to Scottsdale. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm
appeared first on Cody Warner, P.C.. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
Millie Warner, and Susan Gross Sholinsky take a trip around the world with Andrew Lilley, Head of Employment Law at Deloitte Legal, to highlight some of these unique distinctions and discuss how global employers can navigate these differences. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
Millie Warner, and Susan Gross Sholinsky take a trip around the world with Andrew Lilley, Head of Employment Law at Deloitte Legal, to highlight some of these unique distinctions and discuss how global employers can navigate these differences. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
Millie Warner, and Susan Gross Sholinsky take a trip around the world with Andrew Lilley, Head of Employment Law at Deloitte Legal, to highlight some of these unique distinctions and discuss how global employers can navigate these differences. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 11:51 am
appeared first on Cody Warner, P.C.. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 2:56 pm
In 1938, the Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the major studios at the time, also known as the Big Five (MGM, Paramount, RKO, 20th Century Fox, and Warner Brothers) and the Little Three (Universal, United Artists, and Columbia). [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
The judge thus considered under sufficiency whether it was "plausible" that substantially all compounds following under the claim would have the technical effect of reducing the effects of food.The UK ab initio plausibility test On "plausibility", the judge considered the Supreme Court decision in Warner Lambert as requiring there to be "some reasons for supposing" that a claimed invention has its purported technical effect (para. 226). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
Also relying on a passage from the Supreme Court’s judgment in Warner Lambert v Generics (UK) [2018] UKSC 56 (“the specification must disclose some reason for supposing that the implied assertion of efficacy in the claim is true”), Mellor J noted that while the parties construed integer A differently (efficacy being express in the Defendant’s construction rather than implied), the threshold for plausibility was the same on either construction, with the key wording… [read post]
