Search for: "Washington v. Jordan" Results 181 - 200 of 436
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm by David Kris
Now, as the New York Times and the Washington Post have reported, Republicans including Reps. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin discuss Sveen at Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At SportsHandle, Ryan Rodenberg notes that in a “prediction market” run by a Washington, D.C. company that allows participants to bet on the outcomes of Supreme Court cases, including Christie v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
In response, he planned and eventually ordered a large-scale, broad-daylight, armed raid on the Ramallah branch of the Jordan-based Arab Bank. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage of the grants comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post and Adam Liptak for The New York Times. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am by Jordan Brunner
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am by Vanessa Sauter
District Court in Washington DC heard arguments this week in ACLU v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm by EEM
"State Practice with Respect to the Safe Third Country Concept: Criteria for Determining that a State Offers Effective Protection for Asylum Seekers and Refugees," George Washington International Law Review (Forthcoming)- Preprint version of article. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 8:51 am by Garrett Hinck
Peter Margulies summarized oral arguments at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Hawaii v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg BNA, Jordan Rubin explains why in Carpenter v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Jordan Rubin looks at the cert petition in Hidalgo v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Laurence Tribe argues that the Supreme Court should review Hidalgo v. [read post]