Search for: "Waters v. Superior Court" Results 181 - 200 of 890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
They may have a glass of water, but nothing else to eat or drink, unless given permission, may take notes, as long as it does not interfere with the flow of evidence, and have blank paper available. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 11:59 am by Scott R. Anderson, Pranay Vaddi
While experts have disputed whether the intelligence provided by these overflights is superior to what Russia can already secure from satellite surveillance, Russia’s actions have nonetheless led several Republican members of Congress to speak out in support of withdrawal. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Sherin and Lodgen
After a hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment, the Superior Court granted the Town’s motion and denied the motion. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Mary Ziegler
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
On April 7, 2020, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court rendered its decision in New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. [read post]
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows:  Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11]  Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11]  Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:42 pm
  Oh, except for those two tests in which the sample's overly diluted, which Father says was because he just drinks too much water at work. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
O’Reilly v IMAX Corporation, 2019 ONCA 991, the Court of Appeal for Ontario (“ONCA”) awarded a former president of IMAX two years of severance after the court agreed with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice’s ruling that he had been wrongfully dismissed. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 12:11 pm by Unknown
Bureau of Land Management (Land Usage) Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]