Search for: "Weekes v. Parker" Results 181 - 200 of 466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Recent Appeal Decisions We note two recent Court of Appeal PTA decisions: 12 April 2016, Harvey v News Group Newspapers, permission refused after a hearing. 13 April 2016,  Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing SA, permission refused on paper Last week in the Courts On 26 April 2016, Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Undre & Anor v The London Borough of Harrow [2016] EWHC 931 (QB). [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The FLSA guarantees you a minimum wage and overtime if you work more than 40 hours a week. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:17 pm by Walter Olson
Hans Bader of CEI, at Law and Liberty: As the Washington state supreme court noted in Rickert v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am by Amy Howe
Parker comes from Lyle Denniston for this blog and Mark Walsh for Education Week. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
Parker, in which they are considering a dispute over land on the Omaha Indian reservation in Nebraska. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s grant in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 9 November 2015, HHJ Stephen Davies handed down judgment in the case of Oyston v Ragozzino [2015] EWHC 3232 (QB). [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:49 pm by RegBlog
In a forthcoming article, Professor Teri Dobbins Baxter at the University of Tennessee College of Law explored state regulation of same-sex marriage after the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 26 October 2015, Warby J heard the appeals in the cases of Richardson v Facebook and Richardson v Google UK Ltd. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
This is despite the high threshold for injurious falsehood claims, requiring a plaintiff to prove all of the following elements; a false statement about the plaintiff’s goods or business (falsity); publication of the statement by the defendant to a third party; malice; and actual damage (Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 [52]). [read post]