Search for: "Wells v. Clayton"
Results 181 - 200
of 540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Clayton County, in which the Court--in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch joined by the Democratic appointees as well as Chief Justice Roberts--held that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is sex discrimination under Title VII. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
In People v Jenkins (2008 NY Slip Op 07992 [10/23/08]) the Court of Appeals considered who has to prove what in order for a defendant to be entitled to specific compliance of a plea agreement. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am
First up is Kansas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
It is a well-established principle that persons will generally not be in need of asylum or subsidiary protection if they can obtain protection by moving elsewhere in their own country. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
Lewis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
This case (Jason Castillo v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
Ohio 1993), aff’d 43 F.3d 1076 (6th Cir. 1995); and Vermont, Clayton v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 3:50 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 4:30 am
It did so in the 1997 case of Guard v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 6:30 am
And indeed, that perspective may well be accurate. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 4:00 am
And indeed, that perspective may well be accurate. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
Richard Clayton QC assesses the UK Government’s proposals for reforming the Human Rights Act, which includes plans to create new protections for freedom of expression and a re-balancing of misuse of private information claims. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:29 am
Clayton County, 140 S. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
Hibbs (2003), as well as the leading Title VII sex-stereotyping case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:45 pm
Making a death row inmate propose the method of execution, the product of the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Glossip v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 2:54 am
"Compare Lucien Piccard Watch Corp. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Plaintiffs then suffered losses, they allege, because of the deliberate scheme to deceive the market about Kodak’s well-being.The case is No. 3:20-cv-10462-FLW-ZNQ. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:15 am
The name of the website alludes to the 1946 Supreme Court case, SEC v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:15 am
The name of the website alludes to the 1946 Supreme Court case, SEC v. [read post]
