Search for: "Wells v. Marshall"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:06 pm
Pa. 1998) (directing the United States Marshal to serve respondent with a warrant of arrest for the children and copies of the pleadings and that the United States Marshal bring the children before the court); Marquez v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 8:46 am
Marshall v. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm
O'Connor was also a well know critic of the Roe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:06 pm
The following is a summary of the cases mentioned above, as well as the decisions of the Supreme Court in R. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:24 am
Avid v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
In Webb v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am
Illinois, an 1873 decision upholding Illinois’ ability to deny law licenses to women, and Justice John Marshall Harlan, who dissented from Plessy v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:34 am
The month of November did not start out well for Howard K. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:27 pm
Well known patent attorney Hal Milton recently published a new article in John Marshall’s Review of Intellectual Property Law (RIPL) that argues for the presentation of a “new result” within every patent application. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:08 am
Yeh, well, okay, so I overdid it--an absence of sobriety in the marshalling of railroad receivership statistics. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:13 am
Marshall, 2012 U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:28 am
Supreme Court’s June decision in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 2:22 pm
Supreme Court case by Chief Justice John Marshall, and a well-known line of hotel cases -- and public policy, this is one of the best-written, most thoroughly researched and comprehensive decisions in the area. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:18 am
The case is Carroll v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:46 pm
Payne's court in Marshall returned a verdict of $15.34 million for the plaintiff today in the Pact XPP Tech. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
” But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:59 am
V. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:23 am
I send thanks to Attorney Patricia Monahan of the Pittsburgh office of Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, as well as David Cole, the Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute, for providing me with a copy of this case. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:11 pm
The article uses the twentieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
