Search for: "White v. Scott*" Results 181 - 200 of 934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2008, 10:18 am
Back in March, the IPKat wrote:"If you search the Scottish Courts website under "intellectual property" you won't find this -- which is why the IPKat missed it on his prowl -- but Wise Property Care Limited v White Thomson Preservation Limited and others [2008] CSOH 46, a passing-off decision of Lord Matthews (Outer House in the Court of Session), was posted on the Scottish Court website this morning. ... [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am by Jim Walker
 The all-white male jury quickly acquitted the two white men of kidnapping and murder of the black boy. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 John Marshall ended his first paragraph in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The White Paper proposals were a castle built on quicksand, if not thin air. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am by Vishnu Kannan
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Such a move would require White House approval. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 10:39 am by Sandy Levinson
 And why does Joseph Story, the author of the shameful decision in Prigg v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Former White House Counsel Bob Bauer discussed a recent paper he authored dealing with executive transparency and a White House obligation to disclose, and Daphna Renan flagged her recent paper on structures of executive branch legal review at work in the presidential decision-making process. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:38 pm
He suggests that because the Supreme Court is unlikely to overrule McCleskey v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:47 am
  He suggests that because the Supreme Court is unlikely to overrule McCleskey v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Adam J. White
’s commitment to the Paris Accord is precisely the sort of “reliance interest” which, under the Supreme Court’s explanation in FCC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 10:38 am by Mikhaila R. Fogel
Circuit denied a motion for an initial en banc hearing in Qassim v. [read post]