Search for: "William E. Jones" Results 181 - 200 of 599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am by Christine Corcos
Billy Bob Thornton is a Louisiana sheriff involved in a murder mystery; Sela Ward is his prosecutor wife.Baldini e Simone (1999). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Billy Bob Thornton is a Louisiana sheriff involved in a murder mystery; Sela Ward is his prosecutor wife.Baldini e Simone (1999). [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:23 am by Jennifer Davis
William Jones (D-Va.), chairman of the House Committee on Insular Affairs, and Sen. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:35 am
A Trump Appointed AG May Not Translate to Less Aggressive Enforcement Posted by Jocelyn E. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:30 am by Stephen Bates
” If 2016 RT sounds like Fox News, 2012 RT turns out to be Mother Jones, according to an appendix to the intelligence report. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 10:02 am by Quinta Jurecic
All submissions will be acknowledged by e-mail. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 8:25 am by admin
Speakers include: William Allan, Member, Competition Appeal Tribunal, London; Lord David Currie, Chairman, Competition and Markets Authority, London; Frédéric Jenny, Chairman, OECD Competition Committee | Professor, ESSEC, Paris; Miguel de la Mano, Managing Director, Compass Lexecon Europe, Barcelona/Brussels; Maurits Dolmans, Partner, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, London/Brussels; Ariel Ezrachi, Slaughter and May Professor of Competition Law, The… [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:47 am by Jon Hyman
 — via William Goren’s Understanding the ADA Eighth Circuit: It’s OK to Discriminate on the Basis of Things That Haven’t Happened Yet — via The L•E•Jer Social Media & Technology #Nextchat RECAP: HR and Cyber Security—Are Employees the Weakest Link? [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:47 am by Jon Hyman
 — via William Goren’s Understanding the ADA Eighth Circuit: It’s OK to Discriminate on the Basis of Things That Haven’t Happened Yet — via The L•E•Jer Social Media & Technology #Nextchat RECAP: HR and Cyber Security—Are Employees the Weakest Link? [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
Bakken, supra.The Supreme Court began its analysis of the issue Bakken was raising by explaining that[w]e first consider whether the State could properly charge multiple counts of possession of child pornography under Minnesota Statutes § 617.247. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
Even though the Eighth District also struck the statute down as unconstitutional, opinion author Jones wrote, “both equal-protection provisions are functionally equivalent and require the same analysis, “ citing Eppley v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Williams-Davis, No. 2:14-cr-04072-SRB-1, 2015 WL 6942499 (W.D. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 3:01 am
Birkett, Introduction Annalisa Ciampi, Legal Rules, Policy Choices and Political Realities in the Functioning of the Cooperation Regime of the International Criminal Court Pascal Turlan, The International Criminal Court Cooperation Regime – A Practical Perspective from the Office of the Prosecutor Göran Sluiter & Stanislas Talontsi, Credible and Authoritative Enforcement of State Cooperation with the International Criminal Court Lorraine Smith-van Lin, Non-Compliance and the… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Starnes
Chouteau, Austin Joseph Vincent Geraci, Austin Elizabeth Henderson Jepson, Amarillo Carolynn Renee Jones, Dickinson Allison Diane Shelton, Amarillo Daniel Zachary Sternthal, Houston Kristi Michele Ward, Lubbock Immigration and Nationality (8) Christina Marie Boston Cote, Austin Alejandro E. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Starnes
Chouteau, Austin Joseph Vincent Geraci, Austin Elizabeth Henderson Jepson, Amarillo Carolynn Renee Jones, Dickinson Allison Diane Shelton, Amarillo Daniel Zachary Sternthal, Houston Kristi Michele Ward, Lubbock Immigration and Nationality (8) Christina Marie Boston Cote, Austin Alejandro E. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am by Guest Blogger
 A clue may be found in a single sentence from the Supreme Court’s pivotal Jones & Laughlin Steel decision upholding the National Labor Relations Act against both commerce clause and liberty of contract claims. [read post]