Search for: "Williams v. State of Oklahoma" Results 181 - 200 of 330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
The upshot is that, according to UCLA’s Williams Institute, over the next three years there are likely to be 45,000 same-sex marriages in the eleven states covered by the three circuits whose pro-SSM decisions were allowed to stand. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
As of 2013, according to the UCLA’s Williams Institute, there were about 130,000 same-sex marriages in nineteen states across the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:14 am by Lyle Denniston
The petition filed for Prince William County Clerk Michele B. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court actually has said very little in the nearly fourteen months since its five-to-four decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:43 am by Lyle Denniston
The Fourth Circuit late last month struck down the Virginia ban on same-sex marriages, and the state has now appealed that to the Supreme Court (Rainey v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Bartrum, The Curious Case of Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
The great state of Oklahoma is not O.K. with the Tenth Circuit’s holding that the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals clearly violated Beck v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:30 pm
Specialty House at *2 (text added).[2] [Did] the Quapaw Tribe waived any sovereign immunity it possessed in the Tribal-State Gaming Compact Between the Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma and the State of Oklahoma[?] [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:52 am by Randy Barnett
 Instead, engaged judges need only employ the traditional actual “rationality” review that was practiced until the Warren Court in Williams v. [read post]