Search for: "Williams v. Tooke" Results 181 - 200 of 2,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 11:46 am by Steve Statsinger
February 9, 2010), the court ordered a Jacobson remand for the district court to clarify whether it would have imposed a shorter sentence if it understood it was permitted to do so under the Williams/Whitley decisions.In United States v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:17 pm by John Hochfelder
Now, on plaintiff's appeal arguing that the jury verdict should be reinstated, the appeals court, in Williams v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:37 am
Jackson, nor Justice Howell Edmunds Jackson, nor Justice William Johnson, Jr., nor Justice Thomas Johnson, nor Chief Justice John Jay delivered the opinion. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
   What ensued were more filings and lengthy periods of inaction during which the District Court took no further action with respect to Williams's First Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Samantha Barbas
Yet as an adult, Sidis's life took a different turn. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by John Jascob
’s argument that ETE was estopped from terminating the pending merger agreement between the two companies failed, despite a dissent by the Chief Justice that reasoned the majority was entertaining the wrong issue just as the lower court had done (The Williams Companies, Inc., v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:31 am by Karin Galldin & Leslie Robertson
It took ten years for William Whatcott to understand the offensive meaning of the words that he distributed in his community. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But the Supreme Court wrote, in an opinion by Justice William J. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 12:00 am
Cirrito, PhD, to associate professor of neurology in the School of Medicine (took effect March 6); Gautam Dantas, PhD, to associate professor of pathology and immunology; Li Ding, PhD, to associate professor of medicine in the School of Medicine; Ramanand V. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:50 pm
This "unusual procedural history" took on increased significance in light of the Court's February 2007 decision in Lawrence v. [read post]