Search for: "Word v. Jones" Results 181 - 200 of 1,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
Jones, mocking Justice Scalia's efforts to figure out what the framers would have [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Bohne (1955) 130 Cal.App.2d 553, 554‒557 [plaintiff’s daughter took advantage of her physical and mental illness by tricking her into signing a deed]; Jones v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:17 am by CMS
This interpretation reflected the ordinary and natural meaning of the word and was in accordance with the purpose of the tort gateway. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of Google… [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am by Michael C. Dorf
Students had a 2500-word limit for this open-book take-home and eight hours to complete it. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
”              Webb v Jones [2021] EWHC 1618 (QB) A libel claim arising from Facebook postings. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:34 pm by Noam Biale
In other words, it does not matter if the prisoner is actually innocent, as the lower courts found in the case of Barry Lee Jones. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
 He attempted to cite Chief Justice Beatty's own words to him, only to have that worthy point out that what he wrote began with the words: "Assuming that [there were parishes who acceded in writing to the Dennis Canon's imposition of a trust on their property], . . . [read post]