Search for: "Young v. Robinson" Results 181 - 198 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Robinson, No. 08-10424 In a case involving the retroactive application of an amendment to the federal sentencing guidelines applying a two-level reduction for all crack offenses, defendant's request for counsel to represent him in his appeal of a motion for reconsideration of an order resentencing defendant without allowing him an attorney is granted where the interests of justice required that counsel be appointed to address the issues to be raised on appeal. . [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:22 am
Robinson, 485 U.S. 25 (1988) (defense argument that government had unfairly denied defendant the opportunity to explain his actions invited prosecution response that defendant could have taken the stand); United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:10 am
Alexander Robinson, and Dale Carpenter. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
S 1277-A Last Act: 03/04/08 reported referred to codesA3581A Sweeney (MS) -- Relates to the establishment of sex offender treatment programs and establishes mandatory treatment and supervision requirements for sex offenders Same as S 6674 Last Act: 03/04/08 reported referred to codesA4988 Eddington -- Requires the promulgation of rules and regulations which shall include guidelines and procedures on the placement of certain sex offenders No Same as Last Act: 03/04/08 reported… [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
The justices have already agreed to hear a similar case, Riegel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:18 am
It changed the face of American sports.Jackie Robinson's entry into major league baseball occurred seven years before Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 221 & n.1 (1973) (traffic violation arrest not rendered invalid by fact that it was "a mere pretext for a narcotics search"); United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
According to the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Robinson v. [read post]