Search for: "v. City Council" Results 181 - 200 of 4,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 2:09 am by sally
Oxford City Council v Bull [2011] EWCA Civ 609; [2011] WLR (D) 169 “Where the father of children who resided with their mother, from whom he was separated, allowed them to share his one-room accommodation, he became homeless intentionally, within the meaning of section 191(1) of the Housing Act 1996, on being evicted from that accommodation. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 10:13 am
Back in the 1980s, religious fundamentalists on the Indianapolis City Council teamed up with Catharine MacKinnon and passed a ludicrous anti-pornography ordinance designed to creatively outlaw adult entertainment altogether. [...] [read post]
NOT IN MY CITY: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT GIVEN TEETH IN NIMBY DISPUTE: PASTER PREVAILS IN FIGHT TO HAVE HALFWAY HOUSE ZONED OUT OF THE WAY.Barr v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:07 am
The Post covered this last week, right before the lawsuit (Council of the District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am by Adam Wagner
Updated | Manchester City Council (Respondent) v Pinnock (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 45 On appeal from the Court of Appeal [2009] EWCA Civ 852 – Read judgment / press summary The following is based on the Supreme Court press summary. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:15 am by Matrix Law
Birmingham City Council applied to Birmingham County Court for injunctions to prevent the defendants from engaging in gang-related violence and drug-dealing activity. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:45 pm by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure proceeding — Response to discovery In this appeal from a civil action in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Amanda Boskent, appellant, challenges the court’s award of summary judgment to the Belvedere Council of Unit Owners (“Belvedere”) and Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 7:42 am by Unreported Opinions
Administrative law — Conditional use request — Substantial evidence This appeal concerns an application for a conditional use permit and variance to consolidate two adjacent lots located in Baltimore City, Maryland, construct a second-floor addition on an existing building, and use the entire premises as a healthcare clinic. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:49 am
Abdirahman v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Abdirahman v Leicester City Council and another: Ullusow v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions “When considering applications made by EU and EEA nationals living in the United Kingdom for social security benefits who were neither economically active nor self-sufficient, lawful presence in the United Kingdom was not to be equated with a "right to reside" within the meaning of… [read post]