Search for: "v. Trump et al" Results 181 - 200 of 688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2021, 8:45 am by Unknown
Blog posts:Sanctuary Policies, Immigration, and Public Safety (Border Criminologies Blog, Jan. 2021) [text] Through the Looking Glass, Darkly: The Supreme Court’s Muslim Travel Ban Decision (Just Security Blog, Jan. 2021) [text]US: Newly Released Files Show Fast-Track to Deportation (Human Rights Watch, Jan. 2020) [text]Reports:Brief of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees before the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security,… [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 10:31 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck posted the latest episode of the National Security Law Podcast, considering legal issues that might have arisen due to Hurricane Harvey; whether their Constitutional Law course curricula should be modified to account for controversies connected to President Trump; the Japanese legal distinction between self-defense and offense; and last week’s unexpected settlement in Salim et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 4:12 am
Hackman alleges that the defendants have sought to control commissions in the Rockford area by "(1) attempting to intimidate Plaintiffs into 'charging' a certain commission rate for his real estate listings, which was higher than what Plaintiff was then charging; (2) refusing to deal with Plaintiffs in retaliation for Plaintiffs' decision not to charge a certain rate, by refusing to show properties to Plaintiffs' clients, and in refusing to offer Plaintiff the advertised… [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:18 am by Eric Goldman
Innovation * NY Times: Russia Wants Innovation, but It’s Arresting Its Innovators * Contigiani et al, Trade Secrets and Innovation: Evidence from the ‘Inevitable Disclosure’ Doctrine. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:05 am by Charles Sartain
Bulite for separationIn resolving a dispute over post-production cost deductions from oil and gas royalties (PPC’s), the court in Shirlaine West Properties Ltd et al v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:58 am by Josh Blackman
Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene as respondents are dismissed as moot. [read post]