Search for: "Apple v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 4,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Marine v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
(relisted after the June 7 conference) Apple, Inc v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:22 am
In Kinsella v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 10:00 am
In Lang Van, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
Buzz because they deviated from the norm, which may appeal to potential consumers who have yet to decide what side they’re on (PC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Kindred v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:08 am
– open letter to Lord Mandelson urging removal of clause 17 from Digital Economy Bill (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General US Department of Justice: Microsoft documentation ‘substantially complete’ (Ars Technica) US Patents – Decisions CAFC finds specific case where claims need not be construed before determining validity: Perfect Web Techs, Inv v InfoUSA, Inc (GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Apple loses… [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:13 am
Indiana State Bd. of Tax Com'rs v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:01 pm
The SCC applied its fair dealing test set out in CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:08 pm
In approximately 2013, Appling received a letter, postmarked from Wisconsin, that referenced issues supported by WFA and stated that the sender knew where Appling lived, that the sender lived close by, that later that month Appling would know they were there, and that Appling's life was in danger. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:01 am
Sava v. 21st Century Spirits, LLC, 2024 WL 3161625, No. 22 C 6083 (N.D. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:32 pm
And for the FTC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Spencer's stated strategic priority regardless of the fact that the recent launch of CoD Modern Warfare II has been wildly successful. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am
Apple was cited but defaulted. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm
In the case of Wegmann v. [read post]
