Search for: "Barrett v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
In the recent case of Barrett v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:25 pm
Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse, 333 Constitution Ave. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 11:26 am
By Eric Goldman Woodhull v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
Seth Barrett Tillman (United States District Court, PA) has posted The Puzzle of Hamilton's Federalist No. 77: It Turns Out Hamilton Was Right after All on SSRN. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:05 am
Dawn Barrett v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
United States, 328 U.S. 750, 764-65 (1946))... [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 6:17 pm
On Monday, October 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Vaden v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Additionally, respected public health organizations worldwide have reviewed the data, and every major group has stated that food irradiation is a potential tool to protect the public health. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 7:18 pm
Barrett, 494 U.S. 638, 649 (1990) (emphasis added). [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:00 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 22, 2008 Barrett v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 2:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 2:59 pm
By Eric Goldman Copyright * Granger v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Barrett, the writ of coram nobis may not be used to circumvent the clear congressional directive embodied in the 'second of successive' provisions of Section 2255. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Separately, the State of Oregon Public Health Division (ODPH) also noted a small cluster of E. coli infections that day. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 2:05 am
(See Barrett v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
Barrett v LB Southwark [2008] EWHC 1568 (Comm) was an appeal of a dismissed application for permission to make a s.204 appeal out of time on an intentional homelessness decision upheld at s.202 review. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
V. [read post]
