Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2006, 8:01 am
Justice Kennedy made the following argument in State Farm v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by Ross Runkel
When the Court granted certiorari in CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
            With the election of President Donald Trump and the appointment of Ajit Pai as FCC Chairman, muscular network neutrality rules soon will evaporate as the Commission reverts to a general promotion of openness and best practices. [1]  Despite judicial affirmance of an earlier reclassification of broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service, subject to common carrier regulation, the Restoring Internet Freedom Notice of… [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
            With the election of President Donald Trump and the appointment of Ajit Pai as FCC Chairman, muscular network neutrality rules soon will evaporate as the Commission reverts to a general promotion of openness and best practices. [1]  Despite judicial affirmance of an earlier reclassification of broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service, subject to common carrier regulation, the Restoring Internet Freedom Notice of… [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:46 am by Meg Martin
The Justice would follow the lead of the United State Supreme Court and adopt a bright-line rule defining a person who improves her position through litigation as a person who receives relief sought by means of some form of juridical action. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 10:36 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On December 18, 2013 the New Jersey Appellate Division published an opinion in the matter of Harte v. [read post]