Search for: "C Frank" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 6:14 am
Indeed, prior to Franks, lower courts had held that "'[t]he fullest deterrent sanctions of the exclusionary rule should be applied to such serious and deliberate government wrongdoing.'" 2 LaFave, supra, § 4.4(c), at 549-50 (quoting United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members.” 15 U.S.C. § 78n-1(c)).  [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:39 pm by James Hamilton
The proposal emphasizes the need to provide sufficient flexibility to accommodate the different types of issuers that would conduct offerings under the new Rule 506(c). [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am by Don Cruse
Shareholder oppression The Court granted review in a petition about a hot topic, the tort of shareholder oppression in a closely held corporation: LEE C. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
In a recent article for Corporate Counsel, Sullivan & Cromwell Partner and Practice Center Contributor, Frank Aquila writes about the legal challenges to unilateral forum selection provisions and what the future might hold for this important corporate governance issue. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 10:00 pm by My name
” http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2011/09/17/say-on-pay-under-dodd-frank/. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Click here for the full S&C publication with a complete summary of the guidance. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:43 pm by Steve Honig
              * To avoid a surprise from your own management, Frank Stasiowski  (PSMJ President, and world-wide consultant to the A/E/C space) suggests that the board ask its CEO at each executive board session, directly, whether there are any "conversations" going on. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
§856(c)(2) (the 75 percent test) and 26 U.S.C. [read post]