Search for: "C. M." Results 1981 - 2000 of 35,034
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 12:50 pm by José Guillermo
Declarar IMPROCEDENTE la demanda interpuesta por el Poder Ejecutivo respecto del literal “c” del artículo 2 de la Ley 31173. 4. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:42 pm by Howard Knopf
After years of concern about extraordinary delays and other problems that led a Senate Committee to label the Copyright Board back in 2016 as “dated, dysfunctional and in dire need of reform”, the Board has finally come up with some supposedly new “Copyright Board Rules of Practice and Procedure: SOR/2023-24” The only thing that is reasonably clear from this very prolonged, non-transparent and no doubt very expensive exercise and the resulting new document is that the Board… [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 11:23 am by Adam Levitin
  While I'm thumping on the venue issue, what of the "no harm, no foul" argument? [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Coates, Darius Palia and Ge Wu; Allocating Risk Through Contract: Evidence from M&A and Policy Implications (discussed on the Forum here) by John C. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Coates, Darius Palia and Ge Wu; Allocating Risk Through Contract: Evidence from M&A and Policy Implications (discussed on the Forum here) by John C. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
”[7] Under 501(c), both 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(7) organizations are qualified for tax-exemption. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
He was quoted by a student on the Lampoon staff as saying: “I’m gonna come up to Harvard. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 2:12 am by JR Chaves
V.Aclara que el plazo para plantear la inejecución de sentencias fijado por el art. 104.2 LJCA no es rígido pues: La pretensión se ejercitó más allá del plazo del art. 104.2 LJCA, mas no es plazo de caducidad. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  In rejecting the neighbors’ challenge to the project’s Class 32 categorical exemption, the trial court found that the project site’s C-1 zoning allowed commercial uses, including, specifically, eldercare facilities, and that its combined residential and commercial components were consistent with the community plan. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:48 am by Guest Author
I’m not an antitrust scholar, rather, I’m a scholar of administrative law. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Unknown
El Código Civil de Vélez Sarsfield no regulaba el tema atinente al foro de necesidad. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Liz Dunshee
  I’m easy to find – just look for a guy who appears to be a cross between Butterbean & Sir Topham Hatt! [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:07 pm by José Guillermo
Los más distantes, observarán el debate como un objeto de estudio, en donde se manifiesta el devenir contradictorio de las teorías. [read post]