Search for: "CF-3"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
” The judge stayed those orders and purported to report two questions to the Appeals Court.3 We allowed the mother’s application for direct appellate review. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:08 am
Afirmam os impetrantes que o art. 93, II, letra “a”, da CF, prevê a obrigatoriedade da promoção de magistrado que figure por três vezes consecutivas ou cinco alternadas em lista de merecimento, afirmando aplicar-se a regra, inserta na seção que trata das “Disposições Gerais” relativas ao Poder Judiciário, a todos os casos de provimento, por antiguidade e merecimento, de cargos de magistrados dentro da… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:34 am
3. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
Location Based Marketing Association, Global Location Trends Report 2020, at 5, https://thelbma.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Global-Location-Trends-Report-2020-THE-LBMA.pdf [https://perma.cc/X2UX-N6NY]. [3]. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
See also OSCAR GANDY, THE PANOPTIC SORT: A POLITICAL ECONOMY OF PERSONAL INFORMATION (2021). 3 See, e.g., Press Release, Fed. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:14 am
Id. at ___. 3 Only Andrade petitioned this Court for review, arguing that Venable lacks taxpayer standing because he failed to plead facts showing that the government actually spends money on the activity he challenges. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:22 pm
When drawing a line between lawful expression and unlawful encroachment on private life, the following aspects are particularly relevant: 1) Whether the impugned expression contributes to a debate over an issue of public interest; 2) The degree of notoriety of the person affected; 3) The subject of the impugned report or statement; 4) The prior conduct of the person concerned; 5) The content, form and consequences of the publication; 6) The way in which the information was obtained and its… [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 1:43 am
See RUPA § 401 cmt. 3. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
[Rohrmoos] breached the implied warranty of suitability. 3. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
. * * * 3 Our recent decision in Franka v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
Customs HTSUS Tariff Classification Pharmaceutical Appendix Import - Export Learned Hand Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:13-cv-00296-JCG. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
Session 3: RemediesIn recent years, trademark scholarship has focused largely on questions of subject matter and scope, including much critical assessment of standards for infringement and dilution. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
But cf. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
William Ruckelshaus died last Wednesday at age 87. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
If the applicant does not prove the case, no protection order is made.3. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In this essay, though, I'd like to focus on one downside of answering it "yes": What I call the Reverse Spider-Man Principle—with great responsibility comes great power.[3] Whenever we are contemplating holding entities responsible for their customers' behavior, we should think whether we want to empower such entities to surveil, investigate, and police their customers, both as to that behavior and as to other behavior.[4] Of course, some of the entities with whom… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Because policy preferences differ across states, regulating at the state level can in the aggregate satisfy more individual preferences than a uniform national law.[3] And federalism also lets states serve as "laboratories" that can experiment with various options, and show the way for other states (and perhaps for an eventual national rule).[4] A uniform national law is sometimes appropriate to implement important national values or correct various state-level pathologies. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:37 pm
Cf Bruce MacEwen, “Introducing the Maroons & the Grays: Part 1,” Adam Smith Esq., June 3, 2019 (making a similar market-segmentation point). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Cf. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
This could be accomplished by establishing a mark-to-market system[3] that taxes capital gains annually, or a retroactive tax system that imposes an extra charge (often called a look-back charge or retrospective capital gains tax) to account for deferral benefits. [read post]
