Search for: "California State Board of Equalization" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,090
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2008, 4:53 am
Further, one member of the California Board of Equalization, Michelle Steel, warns that California retailers would be at a competitive disadvantage to out-of-state companies because of nexus. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Moore, No. 07-3770 Sentence for convictions on federal drug charges is affirmed over defendant's equal-protection argument that he was a "class of one" subjected to a federal mandatory-minimum sentence, whereas similarly-situated defendants charged in state court faced no such minimum. .. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:25 pm
California Appellate Districts, September 09, 2008 Showing Animals Respect and Kindness v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:08 pm
Plaintiff filed his class action complaint against Cingular and the State Board of Equalization “asserting that Regulation 1585, governing taxation of sales of wireless communication devices, was invalid because it conflicted with Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 imposing a sales tax on gross receipts. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 29, 2008 Straights and Gays of Equality v. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 6:41 pm
In March 2008, the California State Board of Equalization published Publication 149 - Property Tax Welfare Exemption. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:13 pm
Californa Sales Tax - Board of Equalization Tax Attorney California Board of Equalization California Sales Tax California Board of Equalization has focused on sales tax audit of independent mobile phone vendors. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
When the men on the chess board get up and tell you where to go; and you’ve just had some kind of mushroom and your mind is moving low; go ask Alice, I think she’ll know… This time, Alice is Senior District Judge Lawrence Karlton of the Eastern District of California. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Partridge, No. 07-20440 In a suit by a dentist dismissed from his position at a state-run home after his return from active military duty, summary judgment for defendant-employer is affirmed in part, and vacated with claims dismissed in part, where: 1) no federal jurisdiction existed to hear plaintiff's Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) claim, as a USERRA claim against the state as an employer was required to be brought in state court;… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Grand Rapids Board of Education, 384 N.W.2d 165 (Mich. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
George Equal Justice Award, Central California Legal Services2006 - Los Angeles Inner City Law Center's Humanitarian Award2006 - Mathew O. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:36 am
  Senator Feinstein of California, who chaired the hearing, was looking for any common ground that might exist that would allow for movement on the Perform Act that she has introduced. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Separately, the State of Oregon Public Health Division (ODPH) also noted a small cluster of E. coli infections that day. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 12:50 pm
Unfortunately, the prospect for expanding the tax base has dimmed as the State Board of Equalization in California has ruled that entities that refer customers by links to Amazon do not trigger nexus under California law. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
Supreme Court of California, July 14, 2008 Silicon Valley Taxpayers Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
And there is some evidence that many of the remaining 1.1% are women paid to hang out on the "chat" rooms and bulletin boards to make the patrons feel more comfortable.IT IS NOT JUST NAKED WOMEN. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:56 pm
Walker On June 26, 2008, the California Air Resources Board (“ARB”) released a draft of the scoping plan required under Assembly Bill 32 (Chapter 488, Statutes 2006), the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (“AB 32”). [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Five justices agreed that the University of California Medical School's program violated the Equal Protection Clause and four justices asserted that race could never be a factor in the admissions process. [read post]