Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 34,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2019, 11:52 am
Bailey (1932) 216 Cal. 564 and Oasis West Realty v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
California only applied the California statute, and Florida's statute is different, so the search here was unlawful because Florida law does not require all probationers submit to suspicionless searches. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
David Alan Sklansky (University of California, Berkeley - School of Law) has posted A Postscript on Katz and Stonewall: Evidence from Justice Stewart's First Draft (UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
However, a recent court case (Jewish Community Centers Development Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
California extensively diverges from federal wage and hour law in many areas. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:21 pm
California Fair Employment and Housing Comm'n v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in National Meat Association v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 5:51 am
L&ELB has the concise summary: In Edwards v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:35 am
My written transcript:] I’m Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, where I direct the school’s Privacy Law Certificate. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Apr. 10, 2008) (asking Supreme Court to decide administrative law question) Munson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 10:50 am
California labor laws are interpreted liberally in favor of worker protection. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:09 am
Partnership v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
The borrower in Skov v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:08 am
But the California Supreme Court, in Pearson Dental Supplies v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:20 pm
Landis v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:47 am
In Flores v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:43 pm
Because the 9th Circuit litigation involved a question of California law, the California Supreme Court, the final word on what state laws mean, took up the matter. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:22 am
The judge had mentioned that it was permissible for jurors to discuss a case while it was ongoing in some jurisdictions, but made it clear that this was not the law in California. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:30 pm
The California supreme court in Donohue v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:40 am
In Naranjo v. [read post]
