Search for: "Conflict of Interest Attorney for Public Agencies" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 4:33 pm
NOTICE Effective July 1, 2008, you must be a Registered Reader to access New York Public Personnel LawThe index of the subject of cases summarized since April 1, 2008 is set out below. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Beyond that, there are a number of lesser points of interest. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:58 am
The term "governmental organizations" includes, but is not limited to, public protection programs and sections of governmental or public sector agencies [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), Open licensing vs monopoly controlled supply: (KEI), Protecting inventions involving biofuel feedstock: (IP Law360), Brazil: ‘Public interest’ factor in Brazil’s patenting system: (Spicy IP), EU: Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 on advanced medicinal products to enter into force soon, creating certification procedure regarding quality and non-clinical data: (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
– ownership of IP: (Dilanchian), Consultant or contractor IP: (Dilanchian), IP and general business law issues: Website terms of use reduce risk: (Dilanchian), Plant breeder’s rights actions in the Federal Court will now be regarded as IP cases for the purpose of docket allocation: (IPwar’s), Ajinomoto v NutraSweet – inventive step and costs: (IPRoo), Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft 2020 submission: (LawFont.com) Austria … [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
"It rose me out of my seat, and I said, 'We do not have missing files.' " One of the goals of the grand jury was to determine why the Sheriff's Department chose to lead the investigation of a death in custody rather than turn the case over to the district attorney, in keeping with a 1984 agreement aimed at avoiding a conflict of interest. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:55 pm
The problems associated with the action arose from the fact that many of these analysts that issued recommendations on companies were affiliated to investment banking arms that were taking those very companies to the public markets through IPO during the Internet boom, and that clearly constituted a conflict of interest.Regulations regarding sales practices by brokers and analyst conflicts of interest have not been very stringent in India, as compared to more… [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:08 am
The Dallas Morning News ran an interesting story about this Pre-emption by Preamble. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 10:25 am by Micah
For the most part, companies are not interested in highlighting the need for legal counsel to the public at large. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
The FDA is not giving up anything that the courts wouldn't eventually take from the Agency anyway. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 3:38 am
Public nuisance alleges that, taking the FDA's marketing approval on its face, the conduct that the agency has authorized is a "nuisance" under state law and can be enjoined. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
For instance, Milner Ball has defined ADR as "another form of the deregulation movement, one that permits private actors with powerful economic interests to pursue self-interest free of community norms. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:11 am
In that case and others, the agency is focusing its efforts on gatekeepers like accountants and attorneys, according to lawyers inside and outside the SEC. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 8:55 am
Also, as in any exchange of money for lawyers' services there is the potential for a conflict of interest; here, the lawyer, who has been paid all she will be paid for a trial, must resist any tendency she might have to influence the client not to try the case.) [read post]