Search for: "Corpus v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
In Al-Bihani v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:30 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
United States and General Dynamics v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:16 am
Lasater v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am
On October 10, 2013, Kathryn Rivera filed a motion to dismiss the plenary action for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
" Klay v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:22 am
They do not have a federal constitutional right to counsel to pursue certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, nor in other state court post-conviction proceedings or federal habeas corpus proceedings. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Justice Ginsburg added that a 2009 decision, District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Otherwise, under the plaintiff’s legal theory, there is absolutely no way to do facial recognition on a corpus of photographs because there will always be third party non-users depicted in the corpus. 2) I understand the concerns about facial recognition. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975) and properly grant a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the state trial court failed to rule formally on a defendant’s request for self-representation? [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 am
At the time of the USS COLE bombing and the events in question at issue in the commission, the President and Congress declared that the United States was in a state of peace—not in a state of war—in and around Yemen. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am
§ 2254(d) and this Court’s precedent permit federal habeas corpus relief on a claim that a state judge unconstitutionally “coerces” jurors to return a guilty verdict by identifying specific evidence in the case as important and instructing them to consider it? [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:28 pm
Yesterday, in Holland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
However, the Court of Appeals in Corpus Christi held that a federal court injunction is not binding on State courts. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
A recent Appellate Division decision, State v. [read post]
