Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 44,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
However, the Court found that simply stating such an intention does not mean the employee would be successful if they chose to do so. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
As enacted, the bill applies to corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, and other business entities that: was formed under the laws of the state, the laws of any other state of the United States or the District of Columbia, or under an act of the Congress of the United States; has total annual revenues in excess of $500,000,000; and does business in California. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm
From a memorandum supporting a motion to permanently seal the entire case in Doe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:50 pm
Sackett v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
At the hearing, the parties argued the import of the recent decision of State of Missouri v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am
Suriano v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
" KME Germany GmbH v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
(Martinez v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:55 pm
Meanwhile, the United States has filed a cert. petition in Garland v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:42 pm
" United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
In settling the cases, the Company expressly states in its SEC filing that it does not admit any liability and is subject to approval by the court. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:33 pm
United States, issued on October 5. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:27 pm
Deetsch v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:19 am
Barton “Buzz” Thompson served as special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
Facts: This case (Romero v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
Overrule State Farm v. [read post]
