Search for: "DUKES v. STATE" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
Shortly afterward, OC Metro business magazine named her one of the country's 'Top 20 Women to Watch," in part on account of her human rights work, and The National Law Journal named her Appellate Lawyer of the Week for the amicus brief in Dukes v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm by Adam White
The administrative state’s ruinous instability is one of the worst vices of modern American government. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Elie Mystal
She never argued that, because legacy preferences are hereditary, they presented a “suspect” classification that should be judged by the “strict scrutiny” standard under the amendment’s equal-protection clause.The district-court judge in the case, Rosenstock v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Watts
  Some of her recent articles have addressed certiorari (University of Pennsylvania Law Review), the role of politics in administrative law (Yale Law Journal), and specific tools for political control of the administrative state (Duke Law Journal). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
For large companies in general, the ruling in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Victoria VanBuren
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Bradley (Duke), Bradford R. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]