Search for: "Does 1 - 64" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2012, 4:26 am by Leslie Sammis
It is not a violation of the state’s criminal laws for 44 a physician to: 45 (1)? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:24 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"pjblack.me/uQ45vx Image via Wikipedia i used to have one of these: "The Commodore 64 is 30" pjblack.me/vW5Swh from @mashable: "6 Steps for Protecting Corporate Reputation in the Social Media Age"pjblack.me/t1DQFb "Top 25 Oddball Interview Questions Of 2011" pjblack.me/tEyW43 this does look pretty cool: "This iPhone Case Is An Instagram Fan's Dream Come True" pjblack.me/v7seOC i'm looking forward to this:… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It does not depend on [the fact] that the patent specification has been published (see point [6] of the reasons).2. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
How does section 1021 of the NDAA affect this dispute? [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
How does section 1021 of the NDAA affect this dispute? [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:43 am by Michael Markarian
A 17 percent jump ($2.32 million increase) for USDA’s Investigative and Enforcement Services, which does follow-up work on a range of cases including those under the Animal Welfare Act and the Horse Protection Act. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
 (1-A) Where the Court grants an interim order under sub-section (1), it shall forthwith cause a notice being not less than seven days notice, together with a copy of such order to be served on the Public Prosecutor and the Superintendent of Police, with a view to give the Public Prosecutor a reasonable opportunity of being heard when the application shall be finally heard by the Court. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:31 pm
Under Massachusetts law, 'being under the influence' does not mean "drunk". [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 13; Byrne v Leblond, 25 AD3d 640, 642; Hawkins v Lenox Hill Hosp., 138 AD2d 572). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In art 36(1), an enforcement court is directed that “recognition or enforcement of an arbitral award… may be refused” only on proof one of the enumerated grounds. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
I agree with Baert that the case presents issues of national and public importance, including: 1. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Legal Beagle
In 2010-11, 61 homicide victims were killed by a sharp instrument, accounting for 63 per cent of all homicide victims recorded.For 96 of the 97 homicide victims recorded in 2010-11, 1 or more accused persons had been identified. [read post]