Search for: "Edwards v. United States"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:12 pm
‘The Supreme Court decision in eBay v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
Case Name: Metz, Horton and Basile v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm
United States) giving prosecutors “broad latitude” to present evidence in a criminal trial. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Speakers include Professor Norman Doe; Morag Ellis KC; The Revd Alexander McGregor; Edward Dobson; and The Revd Stephen Coleman. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
More importantly, they state that it is medically desirable to do so. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm
A majority of the Justices joined in the critique, most strongly expressed in 2014 in Harris v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:28 am
He has alleged that "Jews … think they have cornered the market on suffering" and that Jews are "quick to yell 'anti-Semitism,'" because of "an arrogance of power – because Jews have such a strong lobby in the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am
’ (2015) 7 Journal of Media Law 1, 21. [2] See, eg, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art 19(3). [3] SPEECH Act s 3; United States Code, title 28, Part VI, § 4102. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Edwards, C., and A. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:04 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 2:23 pm
The North Carolina Supreme Court in 1843's State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Over in the States, London-based solicitor Mark Lewis is working with Norman Siegel of Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans LLP and Steven Hyman of McLaughlin & Stern LLP to look into allegations of phone hacking in the US. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection John Edwards, the Information Commissioner, has opened an investigation into concerns that the Ministry of Justice itself was unlawfully processing barristers’ personal data. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:23 pm
Russell Realty Associates v. [read post]
