Search for: "Estate of Hill"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
TLA handles personal injury, real estate, estate planning, divorce, bankruptcy, criminal law. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Rev. 1002***Christopher Celentino, DIVORCE AND BANKRUPTCY: SPOUSAL SUPPORT AS PROPERTY OF THE ESTATE, 28 Cal. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:22 am
The indictment alleges that the mortgages were obtained to finance the purchase of properties throughout Chicago and in suburban Country Club Hills by buyers who were fraudulently qualified for loans, while the defendants allegedly profited from fees they were paid and undisclosed payments they obtained. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
Fonseca’s counsel obtained significant awards on behalf of the Estate of Mr. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
Five years later, as part of a real estate refinancing, an attorney drafted, but the parties never signed, an amended limited partnership agreement (the “Disputed Amendment”). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:34 am
The six-day hearing kicked off Monday after former real estate partner Sarah Sweeney started proceedings against DLA Piper last year. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:30 am
The UPREIT structure was developed as a tool to ‘avoid the federal income tax that would result upon recognition of gain on the transfer of real estate already owned by an individual or by a [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:51 am
They are also charged with fraudulently preparing various financial and real estate documents. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm
Estate of Jeremy Gandy v Pantego Camp Thurman, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:12 am
Okay, hold on… what in the Sam Hill is a “standard error? [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm
Even prevalent cities like Palos Verdes Estates, patrolled by Los Angeles County Sheriffs, and Hillsborough [safest city] have crimes statistics some red states would not approve of. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
[Page 1:] The plaintiffs, Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and Bluesnap, Inc. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:10 pm
Chapin Hill Estates, Inc., 996 A.2d 1167, 1176 (Vt. 2010) (numerous citations omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The project site lies two miles south of theFresnoCountyline and the Panoche Hills, and 15 miles west of I-5 and theSan JoaquinValley; in addition to providing forage for cattle grazing, the property lies within a conservation area important to endangered species such as theSan Joaquinkit fox, giant kangaroo rat, and blunt-nosed leopard lizard. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
A memo from the City Manager stressed that the conditions of approval (with the exception of one notice condition unrelated to any potential environmental impact) were “standard conditions” imposed on all residential developments in the hills and were not intended to address any specific impacts of this project. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
In a partially published (but mostly unpublished) opinion filed on March 7, 2024, the Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment and writ-discharge order which had upheld Kern County’s most recently revised “streamlined permitting” ordinance for oil and gas wells and its associated CEQA review. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
Others, including petitioner Save Our Access, disagreed, claiming views from homes in Mission Hills, Point Loma, Linda Vista and Claremont that overlook the Midway/Sports Arena would be adversely impacted by removal of the height limit, which would lead to development with significant environmental impacts on aesthetics, land use, traffic, human health, air and water quality, and GHG emissions. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
City of Irvine (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1110 (“Royalty”) and Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:18 am
When all was said and done, it was a case of “same wine, different bottle” for Defendant and Appellant San Mateo Community College District (“District”) after the First District Court of Appeal’s published May 5, 2017 decision, following remand from the California Supreme Court, in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm
Supreme Court Again Weighs In On CEQA Subsequent Review Standards Following Negative Declarations – Grants, Retransfers, and Depublishes First District’s Coastal Hills Rural Preservation Decision” (posted November 30, 2016); “Supreme Court Depublishes Quirky Fourth District CEQA/General Plan Decision” (posted August 26, 2016); “Supreme Court Depublishes Lengthy CEQA Categorical Exemption Case” (posted October 1, 2015); but see also… [read post]
