Search for: "FRANCE v. STATE"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 3,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
Their request comes after France’s DPA, the Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés, fined the retail giant for excessive surveillance claims, which Amazon has disputed. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:26 am
Many state courts still apply the Chevron Oil test regarding their own state laws. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
(Ars Technica) New Zealand NZ releases consultation on revised three strikes proposal (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) Nigeria 2 Face Idibia sheds light on music industry in Nigeria (Afro-IP) Norway Pirate Bay block violates democratic principles, says Norway’s largest ISP Telenor (TorrentFreak) Spain Domain name ‘seguridadsocial.es’ finds its (secure) way home (Class 46) Sweden Pirate Bay… [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Then, Hill's long-time personal attorney, Frances Wright, recommended hiring Gregory Shamoun ("Shamoun") and S & N for two specific cases. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
See Fox v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Surveillance France has moved forward with its plans for a video surveillance system during the 2024 Summer Olympics, despite the objections of privacy campaigners, Politico reports. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Idaho 2013http://t.co/rcr4092Nau -> Copyright in advertisements canvassed in Harner v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:30 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:08 pm
Unquestionably, the status of the United States as the indispensable nation is inextricably linked with the fact that global finance and trade is encapsulated in the rules and institutions dominated by the United States and - as former U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:07 am
"At first sight, Société du Figaro et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
SEP injunction case law, however, has gotten out of hand with the two Sisvel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 10:22 pm
France – Copyright v Freedom of speech and expression – Ashby Donald and the other applicants in the present case were fashion photographers. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am
Perry intercalates abundant (and delightful) quotations from 18th century cases with his own discussion as he makes valuable points concerning the current debate on copyright rationale and scope.Part V “The lore of courts”Shubha Ghosh, in Chapter 10, “‘If Music Did Not Pay’: The State Court Roots of Justice Holmes’ Intellectual Property Jurisprudence”, considers IP decisions by Justice Holmes, when he was still serving on the Massachusetts… [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The operator of E-Station, a supplier of EV charging equipment, is seeking $350,000 in general damages as well as aggravated and special damages, his claim filed in the federal court states. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The judgment comes as a surprise, as the previously established UK case law had over time firmly done away with the idea of ‘pith and marrow’ infringement, culminating in the seminal House of Lords judgment in Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2004] UKHL 46. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The judgment comes as a surprise, as the previously established UK case law had over time firmly done away with the idea of ‘pith and marrow’ infringement, culminating in the seminal House of Lords judgment in Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2004] UKHL 46. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
In Öcalan v Turkey (GC), paras 163-165, the Grand Chamber at least entertained the argument that the permission of the death penalty in Article 2 (2) of the Convention had been modified by the practice of the Contracting States since 1950. [read post]
