Search for: "French v. French"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 5,346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2017, 7:19 am
The Canadian government announced plans for the development of a national IP strategy in this year’s budget. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Canton v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:17 am
Said French President Emmanuel Macron, quoted in a NYT article about a Holocaust remembrance event, which took place at the Vélodrome d’Hiver, where 75 years ago, "France... organized" the roundup of 13,000 Jews, by the French, and "not a single German. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
I Injunction available after claimed licence fees paid - PPL v JJPB I Trademark application for the devil's horn withdrawn I Jo Johnson to continue as IP Minister I UPC Order on Privileges & Immunities placed before Parliament today I Celebrate 120 years of AIPPI in Sydney I Event invitation - The Pirate Bay communicates to the public: are there any more online infringement questions to be answered? [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:50 pm
Bishop-Burney, Prosecutor v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:23 am
A French language summary of the conclusions is available. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Canada (Prime Minister) v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:27 pm
Justice French concurred in judgment only. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:51 am
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:51 am
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
Belgium and Dakir v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:35 pm
In Samira Achbita v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Simplifying Community Registered Design litigation in the UK - Spin Master v PMSGuestKat Rosie Burbidge also reminds readers that there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants it to get wider circulation. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
| Marks misleading the public on the paternity of copyright works are fraudulent - say French Supreme Court | Should the court be indifferent to consumer indifference regarding the mark? [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
| Marks misleading the public on the paternity of copyright works are fraudulent - say French Supreme Court | Should the court be indifferent to consumer indifference regarding the mark? [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
I Marks misleading the public on the paternity of copyright works are fraudulent - say French Supreme Court I Should the court be indifferent to consumer indifference regarding the mark? [read post]
