Search for: "GORDON v GORDON" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
In the closing days of its November term, the Illinois Supreme Court allowed a petition for leave to appeal in Manago v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:10 am by Scott Bomboy
The second income tax law was soon overturned by the Supreme Court in the 1895 decision of Pollack v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:31 am by Aron Laszlo (Oppenheim Legal)
The CJEU addressed the issue in 2011 in Red Bull v Frisdranken (C-119/10), however, the contract manufacturer in that case did not affix the infringing sign to the goods. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:44 am by Broc Romanek
Symantec Wins Dismissal in Say-on-Pay Litigation 2.0 Here's an excerpt from Latham's Jim Barrall's news over on "The Conference Board Blog": In a very important development in the current proxy disclosure litigation wars relating to annual meeting votes, last Thursday the Santa Clara County Superior Court sustained Symantec Corporation's demurrer in Natalie Gordon vs. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:16 am by Julius Stobbs
These principles were all recently explored again in the CJEU case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb v Lohmann & Rauscher International Case C-642/16. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal determined autocomplete predictions were incapable of being defamatory, based on Justice Malcolm Blue’s decision in Duffy v Google. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 3:10 am by Scott Bomboy
The second income tax law was soon overturned by the Supreme Court in the 1895 decision of Pollack v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 5:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Unlike the federal government’s new response to the Court’s alternative in the Zubik v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
The recent House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am by Verena von Bomhard
  The General Court denies likelihood of confusion, contrary to EUIPO In one of its last decisions in the old year (judgment of 19 December 2019, T-40/19, Amigüitos pets & live v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:03 am by David J. DePaolo
The reality is that her client attempted an illegal competitive advantage and got caught.The case is Amtrust North America v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 3:17 pm
The case is Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. [read post]