Search for: "German v. State" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm by Jeanne Huang
Since 2023, courts worldwide, including those in Australia, Canada, Germany, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, and the US, rendered decisions regarding whether to recognize the SCI Judgment and to allow it as a defence against the enforcement of arbitration awards.[1] This Insight analyzes these courts’ judgments and reflects on the decentralized judgment/award recognition and enforcement system for addressing alleged state retaliation measures. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:40 am by cdw
  Perhaps most germane for the discussion here is its conclusions for future categorical challenges: [Our] cases underscore the essential principle that, under the Eighth Amendment, the State must respect the human attributes even of those who have committed serious crimes…. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:56 am by Quinta Jurecic
Michael Knapp brought us news of the Second Circuit’s grant of an en banc rehearing in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:46 am by Jeremy
The Court states that internet users and also, indeed, the ISP must be able to assert their rights before the court. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Reasonable suspicion" is not required under Texas law except for physical mobile tracking devices like those at issue in US v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
 One of Actavis's experts stated that in he was not aware of any hospital storing Alimta for more than 24 hours. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:00 am
Moreover, since the mere use of goods is not infringement, Article 3(5) should not apply to those imports and exports for personal use or consumption (this could be hard to reconcile with Case C-98/13 Blomquist v Rolex, on which see Jeremy's post here, if Regulation 608/2013 on customs enforcement is deemed applicable: should it be?) [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:37 pm
The cases were removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on diversity grounds. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:20 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 Section V – Copyright enforcement: the technological and cross-border dimensions Section five covers copyright enforcement, in four detailed chapters. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:43 am by John Elwood
California; and (2) whether the Navajo Nation can state a cognizable claim for breach of trust consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
The ICO released a statement in response, stating that it does not share the views of the report. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:28 pm by Steve Sheinberg
  (Schrems v the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14). [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
Jesus Guerra (Slaw) (TorrentFreak) (Managing IP) District Court of The Hague deviates from German BGH Orange Book decision: Philips prevails again: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]