Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 7,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2015, 12:13 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California denied in Puccio v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 11:55 am
Good, 129 S. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
’”That’s a pretty good summary why counterfeiting — and even trademark infringement — is worth fighting against.The case cite is Tall v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 10:49 am
Case citation: Rojas-Lozano v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:05 am
The TOS and the relationship between you and Yahoo shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. . . . [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 7:17 am
In California Bank & Trust v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
Sure, it was a good day for patent nerds as the court granted in one-time relist SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:55 am
The case is Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Good witness testimony. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
Indeed, it appears that any age is okay in California. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm
Is that a good enough reason to roll over and accept the verdict of the minority of the American voters who voted for the sociopath? [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Alison Grant had a lengthy article Sunday in the Plain Dealer on the Eaton v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
This past September, LVMH also secured a $32.4 million judgment in their favour against an ISP in California for contributory trade mark infringement in the selling of counterfeit products (see this AmeriKat post). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
LEXIS 11554 (6th Cir. 6/8/2011) State draws good panel and, since this is the Sixth Circuit, the rest of the story writes itself. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:03 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Jonathan Barker On December 21, 2011, a California Court of Appeal held in Aleman v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
While this is a startling good defense ruling from a trademark law standpoint, I could see a state bar arguing that ads violate ethics rules if they produce hundreds of potentially misdirected prospective clients. [read post]
