Search for: "Grant v. United States of America" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Timothy Bonis
Michael Young cites the Court’s 1995 ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
We reject that result because the United States Constitution cannot properly be so interpreted. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Any other nonimmigrant in the United States may not engage in any employment unless he has been accorded a nonimmigrant classification which authorizes employment or he has been granted permission to engage in employment in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Shana Tabak
Lee, General Counsel, Export-Import Bank of the United States Elizabeth R. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Note: Notably, in November 2016, the Sixth Circuit found in United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 3047 v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
Euroflex Ltd (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom Goodwill, badwill – read all about it! [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:27 am
The first raises profound legal questions and includes a forceful attack on either our society or on at least two members of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Julia Spiegel
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:41 am by Marlene Nicolas and Karina Layugan
  The Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) challenged the 2010 interpretation arguing that it was invalid under Paralyzed Veterans of America v. [read post]