Search for: "Hand v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 30,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 11:42 am
This intriguing question was recently explored in the appellate case of Connecticut v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:42 am
This intriguing question was recently explored in the appellate case of Connecticut v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:42 am
This intriguing question was recently explored in the appellate case of Connecticut v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
On March 12, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Hoyle v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
On one hand, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In that case, a handful of U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 2:26 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:18 am
Cook's Fabrication & Welding, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:42 am
In Barrett v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 4:54 am
In State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:06 am
Summary: Biomedical Expert Witness testimony allowed as the court opined that the expert did not have to have first-hand knowledge of the accident to provide reliable testimony Facts: This case (HEATH v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:41 am
(Orin Kerr) Today the Seventh Circuit handed down a fascinating set of opinions on the Fourth Amendment implications of long-term GPS monitoring: United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:24 pm
In Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:04 am
They handed down published opinions, featuring Judge Meyers prominently, in the following cases:PD-0493-09, Douglas Michael Hubert v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
The most recent verdict, issued this morning, D.C. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
State, 332 So.2d 601 (Fla.1976); Walker v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
The points to consider were stated to be:“(i) the financial position of the parties (s289(2) 1988 Act). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am
The majority contrasted the case at hand with ECHR cases such as Üner v Netherlands and X v Austria where the ECHR had considered the best interests of the child in determining the proportionality of an interference with parents’ rights under article 8 alone and article 8 combined with article 14. [read post]
