Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 3,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2017, 2:29 pm
The opinion goes on to explain that, [d]uring appellant's trial, the Harris County District Attorney's Office posted about appellant on its official Facebook and Twitter pages. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:24 am
All of this comes about because the court has recently begun to ponder what to do with the case titled Harris v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:08 pm
Supreme Court in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm
Harris v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The latest book from journalist and royal reporter, Omid Scobie was embroiled in controversy this week, when the Dutch translation of the publication named two members of the royal family who were alleged in 2021 to have speculated about the skin colour of Prince Harry’s unborn son. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 4:37 am
Williams v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:14 am
Doris is a pretermitted child because Harry's will does not account for her. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
The High Court, in Sandifer v U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:13 am
Justice Harris refused to do so finding a nuisance offer that does not provide a genuine incentive to settle should trigger double costs. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:19 am
Dion v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
Harris and Kurns v. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Elonis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Specifically, appellants argue that the record does not show any signed contract. [read post]
