Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 82,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2007, 4:17 am
Before that court could hear the case, the Court of Appeals granted a writ of certiorari, on its own motion, to consider Robey's contention that the $10,000 statutory limit on restitution orders applies to adult defendants as well as child defendants and respondents and their parents.The Court of Appeals held that the plain language of Crim. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 5:00 pm
In that case, the Court held that the exaction of payment of poll taxes before registration as an aid to collection was a use of the State’s power consistent with the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2008, 12:37 pm
State, supra. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
The United States Supreme Court recently asked the solicitor general for the government's position on the case of Staub v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:47 am
v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:43 am
It also stated, as it had already held in the cases Pretty v UK and Haas v Switzerland, that the right to private life under article 8 ECHR does not entail an obligation for states to assist citizens seeking to commit suicide.FactsThe applicant was the widower of a woman who had been almost completely paralysed and in need of constant care since 2002. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of the Treaty was to… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:25 am
In State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:10 am
In Beaton v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:07 am
In Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:50 am
In Florida Department of Agriculture And Consumer Services v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am
Attorneys who advise state elected officials need no crystal ball to see what an affirmance in Gill v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
Here is the abstract: In Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
Similarly, the Appellate Division held in State v Wojtkowiak that the K-55 radar device is completely reliable as a speed measuring device. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm
Over a dissent, the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 6:33 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:35 am
The court held that Penn Central is one of the tests for a taking, but not the only one when the state constitution's takings clause is being applied. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 1:47 pm
The first case of the day will be Altria Group and Phillip Morris v. [read post]
