Search for: "Holding v. State" Results 1981 - 2000 of 63,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2011, 3:34 am
Of course, if I'm not right about this and anyone has any better information, please let me know.To recap, the issue to be decided by the court (as stated on the Supreme Court website) is: "Whether a court can properly infer an agreement by an unmarried couple, who hold a property in equal shares at the date of their separation, to the effect that thereafter their respective beneficial interests should alter. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
The actual holding of the case, that the state of Missouri has to provide aid to religious schools for the resurfacing of playgrounds, is fairly inconsequential. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Supreme Court, by a 4-1 majority, dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal on two issues, holding that equilibrium of assets and liabilities is not a requirement of the statutory definition of a money purchase scheme (and similarly for money purchase benefits). [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:42 pm
In particular, disputes over election outcomes may be curtailed through statutory interpretation instructions directed to state courts passed ex ante by state legislatures and increased centralization of election processes. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:48 am by SHG
The Washington State Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:49 am by sally
High Court (Chancery Division) Primacom Holding GmbH & Anor v A Group of the Senior Lenders & Credit Agricole [2012] EWHC 164 (Ch) (20 January 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Moussaoui, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 126 (Admin) (03 February 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Senex Holdings Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc [2012] EWHC 131 (Comm) (06 February 2012) … [read post]