Search for: "Holme v. Holme" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
” Justice Holmes vigorous dissent on the expert witness exclusion issue invites the government to strongly consider this option. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
On the Daubert issue, the only one on which the Court reverses the Nacchio verdict, it ironically relies on a case (Goebel v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 9:24 pm
  But contracts are, as Holmes put it, promises to perform or pay damages. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
These companies had merged to become another defendant, Hooper Evaluations, in 2006, and are owned by Hooper Holmes, Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:27 pm
A unanimous court eventually broadened the ability of death-penalty defendants to blame someone else for the crime.That was Holmes v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 3:58 am
Thanks to Mark P for noticing that Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond is going to the House of Lords. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:52 am
There, of course, Justice Holmes wrote for the Supreme Court, holding that Congress could enact legislation otherwise beyond its constitutional authority, in furtherance of a duly-enacted treaty obligation. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 8:41 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Fearns (t/a Autopaint International) v Anglo-Dutch Paint & Chemical Company Ltd & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 99 (19 February 2008) Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust & Anor v Williams [2008] EWCA Civ 71 (15 February 2008) Raissi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 72 (14 February 2008) Coleman & Anor v Ibstock Brick Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 73 (14 February… [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:29 am
Rev. 581 (2006):All deliberate speed, the remedial formula adopted in Brown v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:30 pm
I'm struck by how close his words are to what Justice Holmes said in Bleistein v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
On January 16th, 2008, the Tenth Circuit published its opinion in New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund v. [read post]